Back to glossary

Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO)

Table of Contents

What is a DAO?

A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is a member-owned community where decisions and financial operations are handled through blockchain technology.
 

DAOs operate without central authority and are managed through rules encoded as decentralized computer programs known as smart contracts. Unlike traditional organizations with hierarchical management structures, a DAO’s key actions, votes, and transactions are recorded and visible, ensuring transparency for members and, in most cases, the broader community.

Origin and evolution of the term “DAO”

The term Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) first appeared in the 1990s, referring to multi-agent internet-of-things (IoT) systems and decentralized activism

The modern DAO evolved from the Decentralized Autonomous Corporation (DAC), a term popularized in early crypto forums after the release of Bitcoin’s whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008. DACs envisioned autonomous, token-governed entities operating on the blockchain without external regulation

The shift from DAC to DAO came as applications expanded beyond corporate-like structures to more generalized smart contract governance. Although Bitcoin is often cited as the first DAO, modern DAOs typically operate as on-chain smart contract systems.

Ethereum’s TheDAO (founded in 2016), despite its exploit and collapse, catalyzed innovation, influencing the development of several DAOs and frameworks, including:

DAOs:

  • MolochDAO: A grant-giving DAO focused on funding Ethereum infrastructure projects through a simple governance model. ​

  • MetaCartel: A community-driven DAO supporting decentralized applications (dApps) and emerging projects within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Frameworks:

  • Aragon: A platform enabling users to create and manage decentralized organizations with customizable governance structures.​

  • Colony: A protocol facilitating decentralized project management and collaboration, enabling teams to work together while managing resources and contributions.​

  • DAOhaus: A platform that enables users to create and manage their own DAOs, promoting community-driven initiatives.

Other DAO variations include Decentralized Collaborative Organizations (DCOs) for governance-focused models and Distributed Cooperative Organizations (DisCOs) emphasizing cooperative structures.

Why do we need DAOs?

Instead of trust-based governance, DAOs operate through auditable smart contracts and cryptographic verification, ensuring on-chain transparency and security.

Unlike corporations, which depend on centralized decision-makers and governance structures, DAO governance is community-driven and autonomous, significantly reducing risks of fraud, mismanagement, or unilateral control.

A flat or minimally hierarchical structure enables permissionless innovation, allowing stakeholders to propose, test, and implement new ideas. Decision-making follows on-chain voting, enforcing rules encoded in smart contracts, and ensuring consistent, decentralized governance over subjective human discretion.

Traditional Organizations vs DAOs; Source: Ly and Shojaei (2025)


Solving the principal-agent dilemma

DAOs mitigate the principal-agent problem, where decision-makers (agents) act in self-interest rather than prioritizing stakeholders (principals). In traditional organizations, executives may chase short-term incentives, such as high-risk strategies for performance bonuses, at the expense of long-term stability.

In a DAO, governance is in the hands of token holders, aligning decisions with collective interests. Since stakeholders benefit directly from the network’s success, their incentives favor sustainable growth over short-term gains. This decentralized, transparent governance model ensures equitable project management, with verifiable on-chain decision-making and fair distribution of risks and rewards.

However, despite aiming for decentralization, DAOs remain vulnerable to governance attacks or hostile takeovers, especially if token ownership becomes concentrated. Individuals or groups with substantial financial resources can accumulate a majority of governance tokens, enabling them to dominate decision-making or steer outcomes for personal benefit rather than collective interests. 

To mitigate this risk, DAOs often employ safeguards like:

  • Quadratic voting: Assigns diminishing voting power to additional tokens held by a single voter, reducing the influence of large token holders.

  • Reputation-based governance: Weighs voting power based on a member’s credibility, past contributions, or community involvement rather than token holdings alone.

  • Multi-signature (multi-sig) requirements: Requires approval from multiple trusted individuals before critical decisions or transactions are executed, preventing unilateral control.

These mechanisms reduce excessive concentration of power, ensuring governance remains decentralized, equitable, and resistant to manipulation. 

How does a DAO work?

A DAO operates through smart contracts—self-executing code deployed on blockchains, most commonly Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible. These contracts transparently define and automatically enforce governance rules, eliminating the need for centralized oversight.

Governance and voting

Members participate in DAOs by holding governance tokens, which grant voting rights proportional to token ownership. Proposals for changes or funding are submitted and voted on by the community, with outcomes transparently recorded on-chain.

DAO governance typically follows a two-step voting process:

  1. Off-chain discussion: Members discuss proposals on platforms like Discord, Telegram, or governance forums (e.g., Aave Governance Forum, ENS Forum).

  2. On-chain voting: On-chain voting executes formal votes via smart contracts, providing transparency and security, though some DAOs also use off-chain voting mechanisms.
Voting mechanism in DAOs; Source: Ly and Shojaei (2025)

Proposals pass only if they meet a predefined quorum and/or majority threshold, preventing governance spam and ensuring meaningful decisions. DAOs also incentivize participation through token rewards or reputation systems, aligning individual interests with collective goals.

Most DAOs leverage open-source blockchain networks, ensuring that every vote, action, and financial transaction is transparent, publicly auditable, and immutable. This promotes trust and accountability among participants.

DAO implementation

Implementing a DAO involves three phases: planning, technical implementation, and the operational phase.

Key stages of DAO development; Source: Ly and Shojaei (2025)

  1. Planning: Stakeholders define the DAO’s purpose, governance structure, and incentive model. This includes designing voting mechanisms, membership rules, and tokenomics to ensure alignment between contributors and the DAO’s objectives.

  2. Technical implementation: DAOs can be built via:

    • Custom smart contract development: Maximum flexibility and control but requires deep blockchain expertise for security and scalability.

    • DAO-as-a-Service platforms (e.g., Aragon, Colony): Simplify deployment with predefined frameworks and limited customization.

  3. Operational phase: Once the DAO is deployed, governance is community-driven:

    • Members submit, vote on, and execute proposals on-chain.

    • Smart contracts automate the execution of approved actions.

    • Community engagement ensures DAO evolution and sustainability through continuous upgrades and governance refinements.

This structure ensures that DAOs remain transparent, decentralized, and adaptable over time.

Types of DAOs

Protocol DAOs govern and manage blockchain protocols. Example: Uniswap, a decentralized exchange (DEX), where token holders vote on protocol upgrades and fee structures.

Collector DAOs focus on acquiring and managing valuable assets, particularly digital art and NFTs. Example: PleasrDAO, known for purchasing high-profile digital collectibles.

Operating System DAOs provide frameworks and tools for creating and managing other DAOs. Example: Colony, which simplifies DAO creation and governance.

Service DAOs offer specialized services within the blockchain ecosystem, such as talent acquisition or development support. Example: Developer DAO, a web3 developer community focused on building and knowledge-sharing.

Investment DAOs (Venture DAOs) pool capital to democratize investment in decentralized finance (DeFi) and web3 projects. Example: Krause House, governed by basketball fans aiming to own and operate an NBA team.

Grant DAOs allocate funds to support blockchain innovation. Example: Aave Grants DAO, funding projects that enhance the Aave ecosystem.

Entertainment DAOs are decentralized platforms for content creation and media ownership. Example: Fluf World, where members can customize and license 3D NFT characters.

Media DAOs enable decentralized media governance and revenue-sharing. Example: RugDAO, which governs Rug Radio, empowering creators and audiences.

Social DAOs foster community-driven collaboration in web3. Example: Friends with Benefits (FWB), a social DAO where members engage in creative and cultural projects.

Each type of DAO showcases the versatility of decentralized governance, extending its applications across sectors.

Benefits and limitations of DAOs

Benefits 

  • Decentralization: Decision-making is distributed among members, preventing centralized control and fostering democratic governance.

  • Transparency: All decisions and transactions are on-chain, ensuring verifiable, tamper-proof records.

  • Global accessibility: Open participation removes geographical barriers, enabling permissionless collaboration.

  • Lower administrative costs: Smart contracts automate governance and operations, reducing overhead and inefficiencies.

Limitations 

  • Slower decision-making: Reaching consensus takes time, especially with large, diverse communities.

  • Security risks: Smart contract vulnerabilities can be exploited, leading to financial losses or governance attacks.

  • Regulatory uncertainty: DAOs lack clear legal status in many jurisdictions, complicating liability and compliance.

  • Voting power concentration: Some stakeholders may accumulate governance tokens, leading to centralized influence over decisions.

Related Terms

No items found.